Sometimes visuals are more effect than worded expressions. Taking a good ideal, from Pinterest creator Ben Silbermann, vision boards take on a new directions and worth (sub-consciously-social network value of future thoughts).
Here is my pinterest 2020-Life (2020 meaning clarity and focus within the environment of life!)
http://www.pinterest.com/paulgoreegoree/life-2020-career-future-careers/
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Thursday, November 13, 2014
JOURNEY TO MARS (Torpor Stasis-Therapeutic Hypothermia Coma)
JOURNEY TO MARS (Torpor Stasis-Therapeutic
Hypothermia Coma) By: Paul D.Goree 2014
Sci-fi becomes reality, as NASA
along with Atlanta based, Space Works develop advanced prototypes for space
travel. John Bradford CEO of Space Works provided NASA with the preliminary
method of space travel. Long-term space travel has been a mission of many, yet has
remained remote. The hazardous space
environment, could create several threats to astronauts/consumers, health and
psychological wellbeing. NASA has found that besides the psychological stress
of isolation, astronauts would have to overcome, zero gravity for extended
periods. Consequences of zero gravity is muscle wastage and bone
decalcification. Also of concern is radiation from the Sun over long periods of exposure, can result
in cancer.
Until recently, these obstacles
prevented strategic development of long term human space missions. With medical
technical advancements, Bradford’s team has
created a sleeper spaceship. The sleeper spaceship carries 6 passengers and
utilities artificially induced hibernation. NASA space studies now can be a
reality, as astronauts travel unconsciously while their metabolism is altered
into slow motion. Space travel to Mars is a 180 days, with this new technology,
160 of those days could be spent in a state of torpor stasis.
The torpor periods
would be supervised by rotating flight members. Each member would be scheduled to
awake for a brief period, to check in on the other members. This would include
checking their intravenous feeding tubes, urine removal systems, Earth
communication, and temperature modulators. The members are awakened when the hibernation
module hooks up a medical system. The medical system inserts body cooling tubes
through the nostrils. Heating pads regulate temperature, to make sure the body
doesn’t cool too rapidly.
The body temperature must drop only
about five degrees Fahrenheit—98.6 to about 93 degrees. Sedatives in the
feeding lines would suppress the members shiver flexes. The space sleeper unit, rotates creating a centrifugal
force simulating gravity. This would prevent the consequences of zero gravity.
The hibernation of astronauts makes the possibility of long term space missions
more of a reality. These missions would be easier and more affordable with
minimal health risk.
(Image: http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/torpor_inducing_transfer_habitatforhumanstasistomars.png)
Torpor Stasis is
based on current medical procedures, used to suspend a patient during cardiac
arrest incidences, attenuating injuries, brain injuries, and improving neurologic
outcomes. In 2005 American Heart
Association provided guidelines for therapeutic hypothermia, a resuscitation
science dating back to Hippocrates. The procedure includes returning an
unconscious adult patient to spontaneous circulation after hospital cardiac
arrest at 32-34 Celsius for 12-24 hours. The cooling method used to induce
hypothermia coma includes ice packs, cooling blankets with heat exchange
devices, cooling helmet for the brain, cooling methods for catheter-based technologies,
cooling methods for infusion of cold fluids.
Achieving cooling
target temperature (torpor stasis) can be reached within 3-4 hours. The rewarming
begins 24 hours after the operation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is used to
control hypertension. While hemodynamic
instability is monitored in case of dysrhythmia (bleeding) develops. ECG Osbourne monitor heart rate and the skin
is checked every 2-6 hours for thermal injuries caused by the cold blankets.
The use of
therapeutic hypothermia in space travel is, "Ultimately, what we'll have
to do…It may take some time to get it to the state of effectiveness we want it
to go to," Bradford stated. The project is less than 20 years (estimated
2030). NASA’s recent SLS (Space Launch System) with the new Orion spacecraft
expected to launch December 04, 2014: NASA is preparing for the first human test
mission to Mars, in 2030. Bradford believes that if all goes well with NASA’s
intended future launches, the sleep spacecraft could be a great vehicle for
colonization of the moon or mars.
REFERENCES :
Adler, Jonathan (MD).(2014).
Therapeutic Hypothermia. Medscap. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/812407-overview
Brumfield, Ben.
(2014). Sleeper spaceship could carry first humans to Mars in hibernation
state. CNN. Retrieved from: http://us.cnn.com/2014/10/07/tech/innovation/mars-hibernation-flight/index.html?iid=article_sidebar
N.A.S.A, (2014).
Human Exploration: Goal 4: Prepare for the Human Exploration of Mars. N.A.S.A.
Programs and Missions. Retrieved: from http://mars.nasa.gov/programmissions/science/goal4/
McKinnon, Mika.
(2014). The Orion Spacecraft is at the Launch Pad and Strapped to its rocket. Space-Kinja.
Retrieved from: http://space.io9.com/the-orion-spacecraft-is-at-the-launch-pad-and-strapped-1658202641
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Part Two: Maslow's Theorem-The Great Society (Poverty in the USA)
(image: http://images.fastcompany.com/upload/5_10x10_Infographic_750px.jpg)
Following up with Maslow’s Theorem for the Great Society. I
think it’s important to go over some basic economics, in reference to social
services. Poverty in the United States represents a larger portion of the society. The following represents discussion board answers I provided for a
social welfare course at ASU Fall 2011. These questions and answer, provide a vivid expose of what poverty is in the United States, and how Maslow's Theory of hierarchy of needs can flourish a Great Society in the USA. Within this society self-sufficiency can be obtained, while business/economical growth procure. The author of the text was Jacqueline Brux
(Economic Issues and Policy (5th edition) and the instructor Mrs.
Niles.
Paul D. Goree
SWU 194 (ASU Fall 2011)
DB# 6 Poverty
1. Describe
key micro economic forces that serve to support the continued existence
of poverty in the United States?
The primary key micro economic forces, that support the continued existence
of poverty in the United States are, definition of poverty, feminization of
poverty, lower wage service sector jobs, budget cuts and program time lines. I
think it’s important that an accurate definition of poverty be understood. In
chapter 6 of Jacqueline M. Brux’s text, Economic Issues and Policy, Brux’s states that, “There are two ways to look at
poverty. One is considering relative
poverty-a situation in which people are poor in comparison to other people.
The other is b y considering absolute
poverty- a situation in which people experience actual hardship according
to some objective criterion.”(Brux, 2008, pg. 132)
Between the two phrases, either one
could be manipulated to include a portion of the society which is not actually
in poverty, but because of the measure used to define, they are placed into
poverty. For example, if one was to use
absolute poverty, and made the criterion be, ownership of a home. This would
exclude all those who do make more than the poverty line, but due to their
non-ownership of housing, they are now automatically considered in poverty. I
think this manipulation of definition is used often by the media and political
personalities in an attempt to push their agendas.
Another aspect to consider is the feminization
of poverty. In chapter 1 of Karen Seccombe’s text, So You Think I Drive A
Cadillac, Seccombe states that, “…women’s economic status is often more
tentative than is the case for men. This is particularly true if a woman is not
employed and is deriving her economic status through her partner…even when they
are employed, women face unique challenges in the general workplace. Lower
wages for work of comparable worth, occupational segregation, and unequal
returns on education …” (Seccombe, 1999, pg.8)
Seeming that women represent the majority of AFDC/TANF cases loads,
there is an entire realm of stigma, associating poverty with social welfare,
and women. Obviously these associations are false, yet still contribute to
support poverty in the United States. This is more apparent in Brux’s text,
when it is suggested, “women bear the greatest burden of poverty…Historical
reasons include growth in the number of female headed households, teen pregnancies,
discrimination in the labor market and domestic violence towards women.”(Brux,
pg.139)
Seeming discrimination in the labor
market is a reality, then it should come to no surprise how the lower wage
service sector supports poverty and assist in keeping women economic status
low.
2. Describe
key macro economic forces that serve to support the continued existence
of poverty in the United States?
The prevailing macro economic forces that serves to support poverty in the United States is income distribution. In chapter 6, Brux’s defines income distribution as follows, “The income distribution refers to the division of total income in the economy among different income groups…income distribution is based on…money income: that is, all household income received from working, interest, rent, dividends, or any other source before payment of taxes. Included…is any government income transfer…not counted…are in-kind transfers.” ( pg. 132) I find several problems with this method of income distribution. First it excludes in kind transfers (food stamps, section 8, public health, TANF cash aid), thus these recipients do not have any money income, when being categorized. However the person working and receiving money income, use that income for food, housing and health care purposes. In addition these persons with money income have the advantage of accumulating a savings.
Brux’s states that, “Most people,
economists included, argue that some degree of income inequality is essential
to preserve incentives.”(pg.133) Although I agree with this, when considering
“support of continued existence of poverty in the United States”, I tend to
find incentives a cruel deceptive word. This is because when a person has no
money income (and is classified as such by income distribution), the ladder to
some upper ward economical security is diminished. I think it becomes
non-realistic to vision prosperity, when you are homeless and in poverty. The
ideal of incentives, seems to lapse these two segments of the society. Brux’s
points out, “Poverty also results in poor health and nutrition, which may sap
energy and harm labor productivity.” (pg.133) As long as poor health and
nutrition exist in the United States, industry markets can be created to attend
to the need. Thus the continued existence of poverty under the term of income
distribution is beneficial to the creators of these attentive industry markets.
Another aspect I like to consider is
unemployment. In chapter 14 of Brux’s text, to understand unemployment, Brux’s
suggest one must understand the labor force. “The labor force refers to all
people age 16 and older who are working for pay plus all people in this age
range who are actively seeking employment.” (pg. 324) When these two forces decrease, the number of
people entering poverty will increase. This can be beneficial to some
employers, because it give justification to the Tertiary Job Sector. In chapter 8 of Seccombe’s text, Seccombe
defines the tertiary sector as, “The tertiary sector, or service sector, is the
fastest growing sector of our economy and focuses on providing a wide variety
of services.” (pg.198) It is suggested that these tertiary jobs contribute to
poverty, because they pay less, offer few benefits, are primarily part time
employment and are without union protections. All of these factors lead to an
increase in poverty, using the absolute poverty model.
3. Discuss poverty as an issue related to social justice?
When I think of social
justice and poverty, I think of government and non-governmental organizations
that assist to decrease the burden many face in their day to day functioning.
Social Justice implies, that all citizens are entitled to a respectable level
of existence. In chapter 6 of Brux’s text,
Brux provides an excellent explanation regarding social justice and
poverty. “Because discrimination plays a role in poverty, it is important that
our nation strives to provide equal opportunities to all people in the area of
education, housing and employment…Several government programs are designed to
help the poor.” (pg. 144-145) A few of these programs include, Section 8 for
affordable housing, Medicaid for healthcare, SSI for income after retirement,
WIC for supplemental nutrition for children and women, Food Stamps for
nutritional needs, TANF Cash for emergency cash assistants.
In chapter 7 of
Seccombe’s text, testimonials are provided, detailing the social justice of
poverty from the recipient perspective. Seccombe states, “Few women had quick
or enthusiastic answers to my query about the positive aspects of welfare…Three
themes emerged in our discussion. First, a number of women commented that
welfare provides an important floor for poor families, albeit a marginal one.
Without welfare, several women told me that they would have no recourse other
than to be living out on the streets, in a homeless shelter, or remain married
to a physically or emotionally abusive spouse…Second, several specific programs
were mentioned repeatedly as being particularly helpful. Medicaid was mentioned
most often…The third strength noted was the welfare system is the favorable
review given to several reform efforts. In particular, voluntary programs
designed to assist women’s transition off welfare…The most comprehensive of
these programs, the Family Transition Program (FTP), was a two year
“human-capital-investment” program that included numerous features designed to
assist participants towards self-sufficiency…” (pg.162-163)
Although economic conservatives will
endlessly debate these programs are spillover cost passed on to tax payers,
without these valuable programs, much worst events would unfold within this nation.
When I think of economic
justice/injustice and poverty, I immediately look towards our elected officials
to remedy any faults. To me, economic injustice is preventing opportunity to
segments of the population. For example, I cannot find justification for the
use of regressive taxes in the United States. Why would the society want to tax
the greater amount from the lowest income, than from the higher income. It seems completely backwards, and place
duress and burdens upon the lowest income workers. In chapter 16 of Brux’s
text, she seems to agree, when she states, “A regressive tax is one that takes
a larger percent of income from low-income households than from high-income
ones. Most of the taxes in our country are regressive. Does this surprise you?
Our regressive taxes include sales taxes, most excise taxes, property taxes and
the Social Security tax. Because some of these taxes are not levied directly on
incomes, seeing why they are regressive is sometimes difficult.” (pg. 385)
Brux is
correct, regressive taxation should not surprise anyone, which is why our
nation is experiencing its 11th week of Occupy America. The goal is
to make Americans aware of their true economical status in this nation, which
is 99%. And why is it that 99% of the population is expected to carry 100% of
the national debit, when such essentials: as employment is a huge barrier. It’s
time for the 1% to redistribute their wealth in order for there to be
economical justices.
5)
Discuss poverty as a life course risk?
I feel the
best way I can answer this question, is from the testimonials provided by Karen
Seccombe in her text, “So You Think I Drive A Cadillac?” These testimonials
provide some real life poverty and the course risk involved. At the beginning of each testimonial I will
provided the course risk involved with each testimonial.
Nutrition:
In chapter 5,
Seccombe details factors of living and surviving on food stamps. One of the
respondents, Stephanie, a nursing student, stated the following. “No! I eat out
very rarely, so I find that food stamps rarely last the month for me. I eat
very little meat. But I try to eat a lot of fresh fruits and vegetables. I try
to be very healthful in my diet. I eat a low fat diet. And unfortunately, those
foods are expensive. When it comes to the end of the month, I sometimes have to
pay $20 or $30 (cash) until the next time I can get food stamps. Some months
are four weeks, and some are five. Like, right now, it’s tight. I only have one
gallon of milk in the fridge, a half a loaf of bread, and some orange juice. I
have to be real creative about what I make to eat. There haven’t been any
fruits or veggies this past week. (pg. 112)
Un-Planned
Adult Pregnancies:
In chapter 1,
Seccombe details factors of un-planned adult pregnancy. The respondent is Patrice. Seccombe asked “Do
you think this happens to a lot of women?” Patrice states, “I really do. Well,
it’s like this. Being a young lady, I think a lot of women date a guy for
years. And then you get pregnant. You expect him not really to marry you, but
to be there for you and the child, but they hump up and leave. I believe women
get depressed because of the fact that you got to just totally give up your
life. Like me, I was in nursing school, and I was doing great. I came pregnant,
so I got depressed because the guy left after all those years. I had to resign
in my eight month of pregnancy. But I was working then too, because I was
trying to maintain my rent and my car, you know. I think a lot of women become
discouraged and depressed because what you are expecting in life-all your
dreams and fantasies become nightmares. The guy leaves you, and then you know
you got to turn to welfare, which everybody thinks is bad because, you know its
taxpayer money. People be criticizing you. Then you have to stand in these long
lines to get stamps. Then you have to be criticized on a daily basis. And it’s
just discouraging Then you have to go for your appointments, sometimes there
for two or three hours before your worker calls you. They just blobber your
business out loud in the lobby [laughter]. You got to be embarrassed. You look
around, you know? Then you have to go into the health department and everybody
looks pitiful…You be depressed. Then you be vulnerable to the situation. The
first guy-well maybe not the first-but a guy promises you the world and you are
weak to the situation. You don’t think your own situation is going to ever get
any better, and then you end up in the same situation all over again if you
don’t be smart. But after two mistakes-I won’t say mistakes because I love my
children-but after two down falls, you know, with men, I’ve learned [laughter].
(pg. 4-5)
Lower Tier
Employment: Consequences and Barriers:
In chapter 8,
Seccombe details getting off of welfare, is it possible to become self
sufficient? The is Eliza, a mother of 4. “That’s something I need is a job.
I’ve been looking. I just can’t find the right one. I used to work at [fast
food industry], but I wasn’t making much money. By the time I caught the city
bus, went out there, by the time I got to my kids, I spent all the money that
they gave me. I liked the job, but it was just that I had to pay .75 cent to
get to work, and paid .75 cent to get back. If I missed the bus, I had to give
somebody $3 or $4 to take me. And they wouldn't give me enough hours. I told
them when they gave me this jobs that I needed at least 30-40 hours a week. I
just can’t afford to work less. But I was wasting my time going out there. I
had to be at work by 11 o’clock, but they would send me home by 2 o’clock. I
didn’t even get 20 hours a week. You hear what I’m saying? Ten or 12, maybe. I
think what they was doing was hiring you for the busy hour, and once the busy
hour passed, you was sent out of there. I had to quit because it was costing me
too much to go way over there.
Monday, November 10, 2014
Maslow Theorem: The Great Society America 21st Century
Maslow Theorem: The Great Society America 21st
Century (work in progress-by Paul D. Goree)
Now
that President Obama has cemented another critical piece to the resolvement of
the Great Society. We now can look towards the final piece. Abraham
Maslow, cites several lower hierarchy social requirements, needed for upward
mobility. These needs represent the physiological and sociological requirements of an individual to survive within a societal setting.These needs include water, food, safety, security, and shelter. If these
lower hierarchy needs are not consistent/stable, then social upward mobility is
not possible. For example, as soon as an individual has food/water, they are in
need of shelter/housing. Once shelter/housing is required, they may lose their
job, and then shelter/housing becomes an issue again. Thus this becomes a continuous
circle,resulting in discouragement; in the Land of Liberty.
The Great Society (L.B. Johnson), suggests that all of the lower level
survival needs be state provided (social welfare). With universal health care
resolves safety and security, as AFDC/TANF resolves water and food. Now
American can look to resolving housing needs. We can look towards HUD for some
of these answers. Yet it still seems that states, may be able to resolve
housing much better than the centralized bureaucracy that HUD is.
In
Rubinger’s article: Why U.S. Desperately needs affordable homes, he states:
“America faces many more unresolved
affordable housing challenges. A $26 billion capital-needs backlog that's
associated with our publicly financed affordable housing stock looms.
Traditional federal subsidies
that enable affordability -- such as Section 8, which authorizes rental housing
payment assistance to private landlords on behalf of more than 3 million
low-income households -- are being cut back. Federal housing subsidy programs
such as HOME were slashed this year. These vital programs need to be preserved
and expanded.
Other important tools are at the
ready, but sadly, they are inactive or underutilized.
Back in
2008, President George W. Bush signed into law the National Housing Trust Fund,
requiring at least 90% of its funds be used to build, preserve or rehabilitate
rental housing for low-income households. But this program and others like it
have yet to receive the funding that was envisioned by the law.
Another valuable initiative is
the Rental Assistance Demonstration Program, which enables private developers
to work with public housing authorities to preserve affordable housing. But it
has only been funded for up to 60,000 housing units…”
According
to the Annual Homeless Assessment Report (2013) the following data reflects the
homeless population as of January 2013:
January
2013
• 610,042 people were homeless in the United States.
• Nearly two-thirds of people experiencing homelessness (65
percent or 394,698) were living in emergency shelters or transitional housing
programs.
• More than one-third of all homeless people(35 percent or
215,344) were living in un-sheltered locations such as under bridges, in cars,
or in abandoned buildings. Age of Homeless Population in 2013. In 2013, HUD
required communities to provide estimates of homelessness in three age ranges— under
age 18, 18 to 24 years old, and 25 years old and older.
• More than two-thirds of all homeless people (67 percent
or 410,352 people) were 25 years or older.
• 10 percent of homeless people were 18 to 24 years old (or
61,541). This percentage remains the same regardless of sheltered status.
• Nearly one-quarter of all homeless people (23 percent or
138,149) were homeless children under the age of 18, and 30 percent of
sheltered homeless people were children.
• 80 percent of unsheltered homeless people were over the
age of 25. Less than 10 percent of the unsheltered population was under 18.
REFERNCES:
US Department of Housing
and Urban Development. (2013). Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress (AHAR).
Retrieved from https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/ahar-2013-part1.pdf
Rubinger, Micheal.
(2014). Why U.S. Desperately needs affordable homes. CNN Opinion. Retrieved
from http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/28/opinion/rubinger-affordable-housing/