Sunday, August 31, 2014

Cali Baja Venture


Q3 EDC-myemail-constantcontact


http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/06/17/the-cali-baja-venture/

 The Cali Baja Mega Region started in 2008. It was in 2008 that the Economic Development Administration (EDA), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, awarded San Diego Regional EDC and the Imperial Valley EDC a grant worth $225,000 to develop a bi-national strategy. As a result of that grant, a successful collaboration of San Diego County, Imperial County and the Mexican municipality of Baja California, came into existence. They termed their joint venture The Cali Baja Bi-National Mega Region Initiative. It is divided into 6 regional development agencies, which collectively is the root of the organization. The 6 development agencies are:
1.) San Diego Regional Economic Development Corp.
2.) Imperial County Economic Development Corp.
3.) Tijuana Economic Development Corp.
4.) Ensenada Economic Development Corp.
5.) Industrial Development Commission of Mexicali
6.) Economic Promotion Commission of Tecate
In addition, the Cali Baja bi-national strategy included the opportunity for stakeholder investors and founding sponsors, which include AT&T, Bank of America, San Diego Association of Government (SANDAG), San Diego State University, EW Corporation, Hargreaves and Savitch, Wal-Mart Foundation, Kyocera, Procopio and others.

Friday, August 22, 2014

No Wishes -No Desires

https://www.evernote.com/shard/s106/sh/73880541-26c4-4b46-b82d-c46ef8569b8a/a1f6eb84979aa123ce9601bd937091ca

Monday, August 18, 2014

Who Owns Your Text Messages? and other items on your cell phone (photos, videos, etc)

Who Owns Your Text Messages?

It seems like people these days can't walk four feet without typing their thoughts out on a cell phone. But who owns all your text messages?
The natural inclination is to assume that you do, after all, you wrote it. But as we all know, the law can be full of absurdities that can sometimes lead to odd conclusions.
And in the case of text messages, the result is no different.
For instance, one would assume that typing out any text message would automatically give the writer copyright protection over it. Technically, your message would probably qualify as a literary work, regardless of its inanity.
The reality is that the answer might not lie in copyright law, but rather in your user agreement with your cell phone provider.
Nowadays, while most carriers' terms of service don't reserve the right for companies to keep transcripts of all your messages, there have been reports that some still do.
Furthermore, many Internet messaging service providers sometimes have provisions in their user agreements that allow them to keep records of your conversations.
To complicate matters even more, some federal privacy laws, such as theConsumer Telephone Records Protection Act of 2006, state that users who send text messages can't obtain transcripts of them from their carriers.
It might sound weird, but the reason is because your messages are received by another person. And that person also has privacy rights to the conversation. Short of a court order, getting a hold of them on your own can be near impossible.
Bottom line is that if you want to know who owns your text messages, you should read your contract with your carrier first. But you guys are used that, right?
Related Resources:

Who's Time Is It Anyway?


Regarding regulations of employment and an individuals time and effort on earth. Who's Time Is It Any Way?

http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/whos-time-is-it-any-way/

Re-Post of Person -Environment: Case Manager Neglect 3

During person to person communication, several dynamics are at work, by which effective communication can result. These same dynamics can also result in ineffective communication. The foremost of these dynamics are transmission and reception. If we are aware of these dynamics, it can enable us to consider what it is we are communication and what it is that the other receives. What the other receive is determined by a cognitive which are a triadic reciprocal causation (Bandura, 1986). In this view the individual, society, and personal factors all come together to facilitate thought, feelings and beliefs. If something stated to me, is ethically wrong (based on my thought of social ethics) it affects my reception of the information and my opinion of the communicator. We each utilize an internal standard to evaluate what others are communicating to us. This internal standard, is self directed and thus statement we find unethical stem from our internal standard, which is derived from an external understanding of what society deems wrong and right.
In Alberta Bandura work, SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF MASS COMMUNICATION. Bandura states:
People are not only knowers and performers. They are also self-reactors with a capacity
for self-direction. Effective functioning requires the substitution of self-regulation for external
sanctions and demands. The self-regulation of motivation, affect and action operates partly
through internal standards and evaluative reactions to one’s own behavior (Bandura, 1991a).
The anticipated self-satisfaction gained from fulfilling valued standards and discontent with
substandard performances serve as incentive motivators for action. The motivational effects do
not stem from the standards themselves, but from the evaluative self-investment in activities
and positive and negative reactions to one’s performances
Thus effective communication results from a balanced transmission thoughts received and transmitted. Balanced is obtained, when information received is in accordance with ethics and principles of the receives psyche. This means that the transmitter of information, should take into account, the possible disposition of the receiver. We would think that professionals that administer civic duty, are aware of these factors and attempt to avoid them. But that is not the case, while receiving housing assistance through South West Behavioral Services, I found professionals to be unethical!

MY HOUSING ISSUES: (Nov 2012-2014)
I had been approved for housing and was in the process of a meet and greet with my future roommate. The case manager’s Margret Finn and Johnny Garcia briefed me before the meet and greet and then we proceeded to the apartment. Two problems were made apparent to me, regarding the case managers ethics. Mrs. Finn praised my resume and seemed impressed with prior supervision/management skills I had. I was leery, wondering why my resume was of any importance – this was a housing placement not a employment opportunity. Mrs. Finn and Mr. Garcia then proceed to brief me, violating confidentiality regulations. They briefed me about their encounters with my prospective roommate. Informing me how he had embarrassed them, when he confronted them at their office, due to their neglect regarding their placement decisions. He felt that they kept placing detrimental clients with him, and that those clients behavior were a factor by which the living environment became negative and hostile. They informed me of how they wanted me to be aggressive when we arrive at the apartment and to not let the roommate take advantage of the conversation.
I could not believe that these two professional were actually communicating to me, what they desired of me, in regards to this meet and greet. I could not believe that these two “professionals” divulged personal information to me about another client. Mrs. Finn made the assertion that she would appreciate me being a quasi -attendant / advisor to my prospective roommate. She informed me that since I was studying Social Welfare, it would be great if I could advise/encourage my future roommate to consider going to community college.
It seems that during the nearly 2 years of his housing, he had failed to enroll in college as required by the program, as it pertained to him (client personal development agreement). He only had 3 months left in the program, and she felt that my experience could be affective and hopefully he would enroll before the end of the 3 months: making his case a successful transition. I informed Mrs. Finn, that I consider that employment. Mrs. Finn responded by stating, “Well don’t think of it as employment…” However what Mrs. Finn failed to realize is as a social welfare student, I am required by NASW not to do any attending/advising/counseling unless a licensed supervisor is present.
I can’t believe Mrs. Finn and Mr. Garcia actually placed me in an environment, where by my future career would be jeopardized. This ordeal particularly irritates me, seeming while living in Las Vegas Nevada, my last employer and I had confrontation with the Labor Board. My prior employer was accused of a similar ordeal. Requesting employment, but not considering it employment. The Labor Commission obtain back payment for me, seeming employment is clearly define, when the employer instructs desired assignments. Thus I find Mrs.Finn and Mr. Garcia negligent in their professions as they wrongfully used me to obtain information for them. Mr. Garcia requested similar desires, regarding my second roommate.
For more information regarding employment and non-employment: Read prior post by me, “Who’s Time Is It Anyway?”

Person-Environment: Case Manager Neglect 3

http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/person-environment-case-manager-neglect-3/

Friday, August 15, 2014

Person Environment Case Manager Neglect (First Post)

Person-Environment: Case Manager Neglect (First Post)

http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2013/09/22/person-environment-and-case-worker-neglect/

Some never realize or maybe simple refuse to recognize the emotional damage they have placed upon another person, with their unethical neglect. And so the victim continue to vents…May he/she continue until they come to some closure of the events as they occurred. Professional case workers are ethical required to attend to the code of ethics of their profession. When this is not done, and life changing events occur (including duress) they have failed their client, organization, community, and themselves as being one to encourage, empower and assist. So if I’m correct Behavioral Health Paraprofessional require a R9-20-204 and an associate’s degree. Behavioral Health Professional require anA.A.C. R9-20-204 and a Bachelor degree. Both should have integrity and recognize the result of their neglected actions. If a program is designed with the Strength Theory basis, why would a professional neglect the Biopsychosocial/Ecological factors of their clients? Why would you place a level 1 client with a level 3 client and not intervene when the collision occurs. The local police department and 911 records document a dysfunctional environment. One client constant telephone complaints to the case workers documents a dysfunctional environment. Then on December 23, 2012 an upset case worker calls the second client (using derogatory language) claiming his discontent with the situation and how he was coming to end the entire ordeal. Yet NO SHOW. How could a professional simple ignore the importance of environment regarding behavioral services?
In Carel Germain and Alex Gitterman’s work, Ecological Perspective. Germain and Giterman detail the person-environment dynamic.

Person -Environment Case Manager Neglect Continues...


Person-Environment: Case Manager Neglect Continues...

http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2013/09/22/person-environment-and-case-worker-neglect/


PERSON – ENVIRONMENT: CASE MANAGER NEGLECT (2 year update…)

As I look back, nearly 2 years have passed. I am still in REVOLT. I can not move forward knowing , that the incidences regarding South West Behavioral Services, have gone unattended. I t is of particle concern to me, because I have decided that I will no longer seek an BSW/MSW . After this has concluded, I will continue on within the social service field, but the thought of becoming licensed and professionally affiliated at this point seems, useless-considering the unethical actions of Margret Finn and Johnny Garcia. It is important that I always let this event be a reminder of how easily a persons life can change. As a case manager, I was being trained to attended to these changes, thus helping one develop self -determinate measures, by which they could be preventative to the unforeseen causalities of life.  I firmly believe that when assisting, one must be fully aware of the Biopsychosocio-Spiritual dimensions of an individuals total state of being.

Understanding the dynamics of a persons full state of being, makes it possible for not only the case manager, but the client to see a step by step development approach to behavior that is based on biological factors, psychological factors, sociological factors and spiritual factors. Understanding these factors, I believe help fuel a person to self -determinate actions, as they perceive their total existence is based on more than just themself. Thus no one individual is the total responsibility of their actions, seeming we live within a social interactive society. Like -wise no one individual is 100% responsible for their total actions, seeming others are required for an interaction to occur. Thus social inter-action involves individuals affecting each other and influencing thought, leading to behavior.


I reflect on these events, (I have termed: Person –Environment: Case Manager Neglect) and so many unanswered questions exist. Today I questioned yet another neglecting moment, where the case manager could have intervened, and they did not.   During 3/2013  Johnny Garcia  brought to my attention, information that proves him not proceeding ethically.  Mr. Garcia phoned me and probed for information regarding an accusation from my roommate. My roommate had informed Mr. Garcia that I had raped him. This event did not occurred. But the fact that Mr. Garcia failed to proceed accordingly proves that  Mr. Garcia was aware of dangerous events (such as false accusations), that could foster and incriminate or lead to other destructive results. Knowing this to be a fact, he did not find it necessary to intervene at that point. Leaving me and my roommate in a very hostile environment, which now he has acknowledge is unsafe. I can’t believe that a state licensed case manager, would leave a client in a unsafe environment.  It’s event such as this, I can not begin to come to terms with moving forward. Thus I will continue to post the events of 8 month of torment ( November 2012-June 2013) as they occurred, and by which Margret Finn and Johnny Garcia neglected their licensed obligated duty to intervene.

Thursday, August 7, 2014

Hanging Fire Jimmy Cliff

@floridagirl674 your a fucking saint

False Life Insurance : Yahoo Answer Community 2007

http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/false-life-insurance-yahoo-answer-community-2007/
Something I wrote back in 2009: Still applies to me today, expect more adversaries (external and No Mass)

 SAME DAY MAN
By: Paul DeWitt Goree copyright 08/09 PDG LVNV


You’ll never find me, at local discotheques after hours
There’s days, time subsisted and lived: is a crime, just like dictating worth, with paper dollars
“Oh Thou be in search to find, what’s lost, the social scars are so revealing, with life too uneasy.
You see I played that game, and drove myself insane.
Got an addiction to, falsifies never understood.
The boy next door who use to walk your dog
Got lost as the story goes! Where at, it's yet revealed.
Yes, that boy next door, imprudent, jester ,lurch around , 2nd person “HEY HEY IT’S ME”
Got rapt, sunk in, by a trick bagger, some wounds are self commenced. Yet on the other side of LUCK - Energy is best, released…

Chorus:
I’m the same day man that I use to be
Same day man, that I use to be
Same day man, that I use to be
I’m not unmasked to fool
I’m the same day man…


So ask your questions, to whoever’s paying by the hour
The space of 7th degree, is something I really can’t afford to.
And so it’s good for you, the aerials are controlling, every hour.
With spirits free, , it’s manifest’s burning - “No Social Disrespect-No Revolution is to follow!!!”
You see I slapped that cuff off, step from the “Looking Glass”, feels good to breath at last.
I'm that same day boy, sparked with a tactful smile, so proud to crawl and fail, integrity worn proud.


Repeat Chorus:

BRIDGE:
Next time for sure, don iron shoes, them others kind are too unkind (and hurt your feet)
A barefoot boy, grown into to a man,, not in a beggar suit, this is the HOBO VOGUE (roam, it’s prudent, live and learn it, do it)
You can only be, to be beat, believe, there is no earthly undone deed
You get to see, seed, succeed, life is ENERGY concurring matter, feeds.
Keep to the dance, don’t stop the dance,!
Keep on willing to believe…don’t stop the dance.

Chorus:
You see I still the same day man that I use to be
Same day man that I use to be
Same day man that I’ll always be
I’m not too remote peculiar…I’M THE SAME DAY MAN
(as yesterday, and tomorrow day, and all the days that never go away)

ONWARD De Mon Faire
By: Paul Dewit Goree 8/7/2014 (PHX wave conclusion 8/2014)

Gone are the feelings, the mislead urges
Denied, keeping me hungry forever
Washed in the tide an insipid star
The star you stole and deprived me

Gone are excuses, the lingering fuel
Of a life mistake, dooming a forward tread
With nothing from nothing, growth with nothing done
It’s seems life has a power, a power of its’ own

CHORUS
What I’m not understanding ,
Is now divinely synched automatic
Within the valley , I feel myself
Looking down  up from a peak
Knowing that distances and time
Lay ahead, and so must I
All of the past rest assured
Becomes the strength as I venture on…
On, on, on, on ONWARD, on, on, on, ONWARD!

Gone are the systems of error default
The people expectations lost, now that I
Contest, and demand the equivalent
Manipulation disentangles, no negative energy resides

Gone are the ambitions, of collective worth
Pushing aside, all my De Mon Faire
Reversing decisions, displaced within myself

I find it easier to say “Jesus Love” and let others find their way