Should Private Invest Companies like Goldman Sachs get
involved with Public Social Services?
Edit
Recently in Bloomberg
Businessweek, an article by Esme E. Deprez titled 'Goldman Bets On Cutting
Crime'. The article detailed the effective, cost cutting and social award of
public social service, administered under Goldman Sachs, compared to the
current public social service. In Boston, Goldman Sachs contracted with
non-profit agency ROCA, and together they executed lower crime rates in Boston,
with a lower recidivism. This gave to Boston a new portion of the community
that are fully integrated and empowered, rather than a $47,000.00 bill (per
inmate) per month. What do you think? Should the nation look toward wise
collective advisement from private industry like Goldman Sachs? Or should
social service remain within the social public servant arena?
READ MORE AT: http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/05/3...
READ MORE AT: http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/05/3...
Question : Paul Dewitt Goree
1 answer
Answers
Best Answer: Goldman
and other banking establishments work best as total dictators. Pay up or we
foreclose on your home! Social Services most often require compassion, a poor
quality for a bank. Most humans are self interested. They desire to extract the
most personal benefit for the least corresponding effort. Social Services only
works because there are "idiots" out there who want to provide and do
not demand any form of effort in return or for exchange in the event. Bums are
bums because they only desire to take...ever seen a bum out handing out
dollars?
No comments:
Post a Comment