Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Should Private Invest Companies like Goldman Sachs get involved with Public Social Services?

Should Private Invest Companies like Goldman Sachs get involved with Public Social Services?


Edit
Recently in Bloomberg Businessweek, an article by Esme E. Deprez titled 'Goldman Bets On Cutting Crime'. The article detailed the effective, cost cutting and social award of public social service, administered under Goldman Sachs, compared to the current public social service. In Boston, Goldman Sachs contracted with non-profit agency ROCA, and together they executed lower crime rates in Boston, with a lower recidivism. This gave to Boston a new portion of the community that are fully integrated and empowered, rather than a $47,000.00 bill (per inmate) per month. What do you think? Should the nation look toward wise collective advisement from private industry like Goldman Sachs? Or should social service remain within the social public servant arena?

READ MORE AT: http://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/05/3...
Question : Paul Dewitt Goree



 1 answer
Answers

 Best Answer:  Goldman and other banking establishments work best as total dictators. Pay up or we foreclose on your home! Social Services most often require compassion, a poor quality for a bank. Most humans are self interested. They desire to extract the most personal benefit for the least corresponding effort. Social Services only works because there are "idiots" out there who want to provide and do not demand any form of effort in return or for exchange in the event. Bums are bums because they only desire to take...ever seen a bum out handing out dollars?

Ed Nargel · 1 year ago

No comments:

Post a Comment