Showing posts with label drug chart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drug chart. Show all posts

Saturday, September 8, 2018

SUB-CULTS In America 1999-2018



From 1992-2018 I have been observing the drug chart standard in the United States.  In 1994 while attending University of New Mexico. The Dean of Sociology, also taught a class on collective substance use factors on the macro society. The Dean Professor assigned us the courses reading assignment. Which was the work of ########## titled ########.

This work presented for the first time. Effects of sub-cultural substance collectives. It resulted in the closing of the New Jersey City Police Department unresolved cases of teenage suicide collective dearth’s  The professor mentioned that it would be a great focus for some us to look into, seeming it provided observations, testimonials that provide insight into substance use collective behavioral factors.
 Las Vegas (1999-2011) was the strangest place with so many inconsistent and awkward beliefs. Some of those beliefs I felt were dangerous to the public. They resulted in a false created urban myth. Ex. A group of people were told that the Miranda Rights were no longer on effect.

I challenged the statement, but it seemed that the other 3 simply believed it. When asked why I didn't believe the urban myth was not true. I stated "If that were the truth then this nation would be rioting this very moment."

It's false statements like comments about the Miranda Right's, that Franklin Foer details in his work 'Reality Ends' (.There are sub-cultural collectives that have saturated our American society, thus creating doubt. Their manipulation of our sensory receptors has been an extreme factor: that all data (news, TV, radio, movies, and books) can no longer be trusted as vaild. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/realitys-end/    ( 9/23/2018 see email for reference https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/realitys-end/556877/)

I remember 2007, when the "radio" came on. I recall not believe what was being expressed to me, by some that befriended me. They were not physically present and represented themselves as a review conscious moral board. I termed them "The Celestial Board". They remained silent and only continued their agenda (convincing me that they were real). This was one of many re-conditioning attempts by the collective.

The invisible audio continued. Events such as baseball games, television, radio, magazines, books especially the internet. Seemed to be altered/dub-over to merge me within it. As if it was personally for me.

I at first could not handle it. It seemed to increase in volumes. I internalized a strategy by which I focused my thoughts -demanding my mind to remember everything that I could from college pertaining to thought process and memory. I wanted to find evidence that validated whether the audio was internal or e eternal. If external I could relax a little. I determined it was external.

This helped me keep my mind straight as the audio and people’s actions began to increase and be more elaborate. Incidents such as walk-ways in apartments or down stairs apartments with secret passages to upstairs apartments. These where utilized for surveillance and reconditioning. The reconditioning was done with whispers as the person hide.

I remember statements such as "I'm going to put my mind, in your head and then control your body." Talks of puppets and voodoo dolls, being used to control people. These types of discussions were meant to desensitize a person.

Some people started talking about the symbolic representation of the white cars and black cars. This subject never dissolved from 2001-2015 in Las Vegas and Phoenix. In 2015 I relocated to San Diego, and while doing Cal-Works, I was asked by an SSD Behavioral citizen: "What I thought about the senior citizens driving white cars or black cars, with their young adult grandchildren?"

I told him I thought such talk wasn’t tweeter' talk. Ge got mad and began to justify his usage of meth from the age of 15. His arrest by '51 Jump Street' type agents at his high school in San Diego, CA.
His juvenile justice sentence. Then his adult penitentiary time for distribution, manufacturing and possession of meth. He did 20 years- 2 different sentences.

I informed him that I sorry that labelled him a tweeter. But that's my way of screening people who ask me question about meth and its sub-cultural collective. I then proceeded to question him with a self-determinate, strength base, empowerment discussion. I asked him the following questions.

1)  When the white/black cars approach you. Do they stop and honk their horn at you?
1) He relied--No

2)  When they are parked near you do they point their finger or shout out to you-thus identifying you as a meth user?
2) No

3) Do you ever see them with a cell phone? Perhaps calling the police?
3) No

4) Do they ever prevent you from continuing smoking meth while they are present?
4) No

I asked him to think about how he feels-regarding his 'No' answers and their possible intent towards him. He thought for a moment and said "they only made me more uncomfortable."
I asked him did he think they were effective. He paused and then started laughing stating, "No"-seeming I still continued to smoke. They were more like a nuance trying to intimidate him."  He then smile wider having realizing he has control of how others can attempt to make him feel.

The countering sub-cultural collectives actions against adult users, is a serious issue that should be looked into. Ordinary citizens are relentless as they passively harass behavioral diagnosis citizens and regular citizens. They may not perceive their actions as dangerous. But those actions are often unattended to by the municipal. Users are mire unlikely to make a compliant, as they are passively assaulted.

Identifying the culprits is very difficult. Yet their patterns are distinctive. They hide behind microphones, using Bluetooth receivers that are small and hidden. They attempt to socialize with suggestive symbolic dramatized serials. They seem to have negative thoughts and feelings towards non-procreation. Which is detailed in constant guilt trip conditioning. These are passive measures of brain washing.

The extreme could me mental culprits with irrational statements and beliefs that lead them to seek locate their new victims and place them through a mental nightmare. Their victims are usually new users. Not yet completely conditioned to the culprit’s sub-cultural collectives beliefs.

It is as if they have forgotten they are Americans and like their substance using collective. Have rights that protect their individual development and the use of Liberty to be all that they can be. At no time can one American disregard another American freedoms of existence. This is our best collective reward, seeming it is a learning mechanism.

Monday, March 23, 2015

R.E.D.U. Drug Testimonial 1992-2015 and Drug Dealer Liability Act




https://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/r-e-d-u-reverse-the-environment-of-drugs-and-you-work-in-progress/

R.E.D.U is the acronym for Reverse Environment Drugs and You. It in part is a testimonial of my life of drug usage, which awkwardly began in 1992. Ambitious and unknowledgeable, I was attending Seattle Community College. My goal was to obtain my A.A. and a Q.C.D.C which today are titled CAADAC & NAADAC. Having never used drugs, I found it difficult to counsel others on the matter. However I quickly learned that counseling was not an personal advice effort. But was depended and structured around a practical formula. I unwittingly asked the instructor, “How can I counsel someone on marijuana use, when I have never used marijuana?” I was immediately reminded of the technique we were reviewing in another class on counseling. Well that explanation was enough for me, and so I decided, that we live and learn. And from that day forward, I set out to try all the drugs on the National Institute of Drug, drug chart. The chart consist of the following categories: Prescription Medication, Other Compounds (ex: anabolic steroids), Hallucinogens, Dissociative Drugs (ex: Ketamine), Club Drugs (ex: MDMA), Stimulants, Opioids, Cannabinoids, Alcohol and Tobacco.
From 1992 till 2011, I accomplished my imprudent goal. Today I look back at that self-challenge and am thankful to faith (Yes, I always prayed to GOD to see me through the madness I had positioned myself). I am also thankful to the various instructors, users, and theories regarding drug usage. When I was 18 I sign petition and later voted for ballot measure Assigned Number 692- Sponsors Karen Pehoushek and Mr. Robert Killian- The petition secured 260,335 signatures. The petition was found to have sufficient valid signatures, and appeared on the Nov. 3, 1998, General Election Ballot in the state of Washington. (WOW look at Washington State today 2015-Liberty does work and the people have spoken!! update: 3/23/2015)
NOW from another prospective, I have been interested in Drug Dealer Liability since 2002, here is some interesting facts and explanation of the program...
DRUG DEALER LIABILITY ACT

Overview of the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:
Legislatures across the nation are passing a unique new statute that provides redress for those injured by illegal drugs. This new law, known as the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act (DDLA), makes drug dealers civilly liable to those injured by a driver under the influence of drugs, families who lose a child to illegal drugs and others injured by illegal drugs. It is essentially a products liability act for illegal drugs.
Michigan, Oklahoma, Illinois, Hawaii, Arkansas, California, South Dakota, Utah, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Colorado, South Carolina, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Hampshire, Tennessee and New York have passed the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act. Existing law in the remaining states does not clearly establish a means by which drug dealers can be made to pay damages for the injuries they cause. The Drug Dealer Liability Act fills that void. The first lawsuit brought under the Act resulted in a judgment on July 21, 1995 of $1 million in favor of a drug baby and more than $7 million to the city of Detroit’s expenses for providing drug treatment to inmates in Detroit jails. Two Detroit dealers were ordered to pay the damages to the drug baby’s siblings because the baby was born addicted to cocaine and was later bludgeoned to death by her mother while high on drugs. In Utah, the wife of a drug-using professional brought a Drug Dealer Liability Act case against her husband’s dealer of six years. The defendant in that case settled after losing his pretrial challenges to the Drug Dealer Liability Act. In South Dakota in April 2000 a jury returned a verdict under South Dakota’s Drug Dealer Liability Act in the amount of $268 Million in favor of a woman whose husband was killed in a head on collision with a driver under the influence of drugs. The defendant was not the driver of the car but the dealer who supplied drugs to the driver.
States that have adopted the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:
The following states have adopted the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:
Arkansas - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Ark. Acts No. 896 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. '' 16-124-101 to -112 (Michie Supp. 1997)).
California - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1996 Cal. Legis. Serv. 3792 (West) (codified at Cal. Health & Safety Code '' 11700 to 11717 (West Supp. 1998)).
Colorado - Colo. Rev. Stat. 13-21-801 to 813.
Georgia - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 Ga. Laws 387 (codified at O.C.G.A. ' 51-1-46 (Supp. 1998)).
Hawaii - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Haw. Sess. Laws ch. 203 (codified at Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. ' 663D (Michie Supp. 1997)).
Illinois - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Ill. Leg. Serv. 89-293 (West) (codified at 740 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 57/1-25 (West Supp. 1997)).
Indiana - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 Ind. Acts 2924 (codified at Ind. Code Ann. ' 34-1-70 (Michie Supp. 1998) (repealed by 1998 Ind. Acts. 8 (effective July 1, 1998)); Reenacted by by P.L.1-1998, SEC.19 (codified at Ind. Code Ann. 34-24-4-1 to 14).
Louisiana - Louisiana Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 La. Sess. Law Serv. 719 (West) (codified at La. Rev. Stat. Ann. '' 9:2800.61-.76 (West Supp. 1998)).
Michigan - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1994 Mich. Legis. Serv. 27 (West) (codified at Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. '' 691.1601-.1619 (West Supp. 1998)).
New Hampshire - Chapter 318-C:1, et seq. (2005).
New Jersey - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 2001, N.J.S.A. Title 2C. Chapter 35B §§1-15.
New York - Drug Dealer Liability Act, Gen. Oblig. Sec. 12-101 et seq.
Oklahoma - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1994 Okla. Sess. Law Serv. ch. 179 (West) (codified at Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 63, '' 2-421 to -435 (West 1997)).
South Carolina - S. Carolina Stat. 44-54-10 to 140.
South Dakota - South Dakota Codified Laws Sec. 34-20 C-1 et seq.
Tennessee - TCA 29-38-101 et seq. [2005, ch. 77].
Utah - Drug Dealer's Liability Act, 1997 Utah Laws 1991 (codified at Utah Code Ann. 58-37e-1 to -14 (Supp. 1998)).
U.S. Virgin Islands - 19 V.I.C. 641 to 658
Copyright © 2010 Daniel Bent. All rights reserved.