2017 Time Is Slipping Away : Margaret Finn Compliant
This is a 4 year, in progress review of incidences that occurred between Margaret Finn at South West Behavioral Service and I. The question of neglect still lingers regarding
Margaret Finn. It has become my life purpose to let time be the determinate in
the decision, by which Mrs. Finn was negligent and failed to realize her actions
set a very dangerous precedence by which I and other clients under her
management: could be judged upon the negligence of her failed actions. As a
professional she is required to up hold all of the codes of ethics that protect
an individual citizen and thus provides a secure environment within the
society. Her role as a case manager is pivotal to strength based societal
interaction. Seeming Mrs. Finn works within the Behavioral Treatment field, it
is even more pivotal that she upholds the highest standards of decent human
behavior. To lie, deceive, misinform or to lead a client into false
representation would be detrimental to the entire society. The are incidences which occurred while I
was under Mrs. Finn client, as she was employed at South West Behavioral
Service. It must be pointed out, that at no time was I a direct client of South
West Behavior Services. I was a quasi client, receiving housing through a HUD categorical
grant.
Case Manager Neglect: The Importance of Civil Liberties:
...May 2013- Mrs. Finn failed to
acknowledge the private property rights of Mr. Goree. All Americans have
the right to the TOTAL ownership of their private property and
purchases. It is irrelevant if the private property is .10 cent lollipop
or $80,000.00 car. If we allow these minute variances become
non-acknowledge, then we contribute to our nations decline. My paid
invoice from COX Communication guarantee ownership, by which I am the
only person who can delegate usage, sale, or transfers: Not Mrs. Finn...
Case Manager's Violating Civil Liberties.
Regarding the 5th Amendment and the rights of private property. How can Margaret Finn and Johnny Juan Garcia validate
their actions as reputable case managers, seeming they both have violated a
client’s (a U.S. citizens) civil liberties. This question is important; we can not have
case managers violating the Federal Civil Liberties granted to us through the
Bill of Rights and Constitutions. These
action cause more stress upon an individual and prevent an individual from
pursuing life and happiness..I established a Cox Communication account September
2012. This account was exclusively for Wi-Fi use....
PERSON – ENVIRONMENT and CASE WORKER NEGLECT
Some never realize or maybe simple refuse to recognize the emotional
damage they have placed upon another person, with their unethical
neglect. And so the victim continue to vent. Meanwhile Margaret Finn, continues to not do the human/professional case manager requirement and provide some closure of the events as they occurred. Professional
case workers are ethical required to attend to the code of ethics of
their profession. When this is not done, and life changing events occur
(including duress) they have failed their client, organization,
community, and themselves as being one to encourage, empower and assist.
Margaret Finn of South West Behavioral Services, LIES about Phoenix Police Department.
November 2012, Margaret Finn’s clients Paul Goree and Angel Thurman had
an incident with the Phoenix Police Department. Client Angel Thurman called
911, and made a complaint against client Paul Goree. The complaint expressed
notions that Paul Goree had threaten Angel Thurman with several knives. The 911
dispatched 5 Phoenix Police units to 4802 N 19th Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85015. The
police officer after securing the apartment and gathering the report, concluded
by providing a CIVIC 101 Lesson of appropriate usage of 911 services to Angel
Thurman. The officer then requested the name and phone number of the case manager:
Johnny Garcia/Margaret Finn South West Behavioral Services. Finally the officer
informed me as he wrote upon his report, that he would be requesting a
SEPARATION INTERVENTION, seeming he had concluded that Thurman and Goree’s
living arrangement was not going to be practical: and would only result in repeat incidences.
No comments:
Post a Comment