CALIFORNIA, HERE"S AN EASIER SOLUTION TO DRUG/DDL: ZERO TOLERANCE

California has enacted Drug Dealer Liability and now several complicated issue have arisen, which must be attended to. I started my DRUG CHART CHALLENGE in 1992/QCDC and to now realize that this state seriously thinks DDL is effective, is wrong. First the following article is detailing if Californians want to put dealers through the legal system, what about doctors who do the same DISTRIBUTION???? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-californias-drug-dealer-liability-act-apply-doctors-collins

What is most disturbing in this article is the following "...The effect on a community is the same – destruction of life, economic and emotional distress for the user’s loved ones, and an economic drain on insurance companies and government programs that fund addiction treatment.  Shouldn't the liability, therefore, be the same?" If the effect on the community of this state is that serious of an issue, then lets stop pretending and just enact: ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES. Therefore, there'll be no more need to be concerned of a safe/secure future. And the REAL COST that TAX payers pay in this state can be accounted for in Strength based community empowerment-with alternative ways of altered states of consciousness.

It pisses me off, that this state seriously think that DDL is effective when it put the state at some risk. How can the state term, the dealers who can sale (to deter future career choices of some citizens, and deter new user from start usage) from those who can't? Is it going to be an issue that "THE STATE DRUG DEALER" is out there selling dope for the state. Just to turn around and put the citizen through the justice system (an additional cost to TAX PAYERS) to result in what. They non-involvement in the very same system they should be opposing.

DDL CA, states that there should be any determinate MARKERS by which the "STATE DOPE" is different that the street dope. I am lose at this point. I keep thinking this is good to protect the health of citizens. But then let just pretend, "State Dope" adds SODIUM to meth. At that point isn't the state putting itself at liability as it trys to enact substance control within our state?  What is the MARKER clause for then? And serious, doesn't the term, "STATE DOPE" registers with anyone.

So now California has state dope,and state drug dealers, who's job is to secure and enforce the streets of Cali on tax payers money. Why are we going in circles. Just zero tolerance it out. This DDL is so much like death row executions. Whereby the state seriously has to consider that it will be responsible for putting human/citizens to death. Now we have jumped to drugging some citizens.

Here is a personal testimonial by me, when another state/county/city attempt to charge me with 3 counts of murder for distribution, possession with intent to sale, only to find out the dope was from the evidence room. Back then I was just beginning my DRUG CHART CHALLENGE, but now I think drugs/Placebos  from the evidence room, equal what California should consider, "STATE DOPE"! http://paulgoree.blogspot.com/2018/03/co-operative.html

Here is the entire California DDL https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&division=10.2.&title=&part=&chapter=&article=