TWITTER POST and METH STORY OF SUB-CULT BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION COLLECTIVE (San Diego, CA 7/2015)

TWITTER POST and METH STORY OF SUB-CULT BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION COLLECTIVE (San Diego, CA 7/2015)

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 1

What a shame NONE of the tools yet expected to cooperate . Cooperate with WHO, WHAT, WHY and for peek sake WHERE are they.

my life... Some folks say I"m crazy But it ain't enough for the state to pay me. Since they be INTELLI scientists probing me since, 92. You'd think they shuck my ass and bury me. But I keep getting em" stats right dhere! Lame logistics numbering up...One Day fate will crash in and I'll cash "em basters settlement $$$...They should have gave me that D and D and not this doc shit sodium. They should have paid me off and pinned my ass. So what the fuck been going on-18 years and I"m still clueless. USA expendable y'all know me Saint P -Goree!

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 2

Yes No tools but expected cooperation. Sodium placebo which flares acute rectum failure. Oh Well, like Mick Flwetwood sang... "oh well"

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 2

oh well, I guess we all gotta die for what we believe is our LIBERTY AND RIGHT... The rigjth to know. Paul Goree Saint P Goree

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 2

18 years and the battle will continue as far as I am concern. Sodium we knew that in PHX, AZ

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 2

Be the change you want in the WORLD. CHIESPIRIT... Consciously ackniwledging all creation with spirit.

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  Sep 2

Thank You Ghandi for foresight of BEING THAT CHANGE!

paul dewitt goree ‏@paulgoree2016  1h1 hour ago

So the sub cultural collective Meth team, intimidates citizens for behavioral correction. WHAT A SHAME On USA.....(yes 18 years of the Sub-Cult Substance Behavioral Control Collective. And they still having done anything but intimidate and harass. Point in case (as part of R.E.D.U - Redo You- Reverse, Educate, Drugs and You! report 1992-present), SAN DIEGO testimonial (name to be revealed later) :: wanted to know if I had heard of stories in the previous states I lived in about WHITE and BLACK cars. The white cars had senior citizens in them with what seemed to be a grandchild. I used my screening mechanism to identify his state of mind regarding his life (16-present 45 years old) substance use with meth. He was in good conscious state. 

He also represent a STATE DEPENDENT individual, state financial paying for him since 10th grade high school (San Diego High School- with real 21 Jump Street Enforcement late 80's) through juvenile justice and then on to the prison system for two terms (possession, distribution, etc). These STATE DEPENDENT persons (permission provided Sociology Ethic requirement) also exist in Phoenix, AZ (4) and Las Vegas, NV (2). These person represent the total inefficiency of tax payers dollars with no effect results. As done by Goldman Sach regarding felonies. These STATE DEPENDENTS are still using same substance, they have self determined they own usage dosages, they are not involved with distribution and the STATE has already spent over $300,000.00 on each of them and still they are DEPENDENT on the state, due to felony blockage and ineffective treatment.

He believes the white cars seem to know when he is high on meth and are attempting to create a more complicated psychosis within him. They follow him around. They park in their cars and just observe him.

I informed him that in other states, (AZ,NV, MO) yes, I had heard of the cars. But San Diego is the first time I heard of senior citizens driving the cars with grandchildren. I did some strength based development with him. WHAT IS IT THAT BOTHERS HIM ABOUT THEM? WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO HIM? HAVE THEY PHYSICALLY ATTACKED YOU? VERBALLY EXPRESSED ANYTHING? HAVE THEY CALL/INFORMED THE ENFORCEMENT OF YOU?

NO was the answer to all of these questions. Thus then he can realize, Yes they only irritate him and thus they really are no danger and are just wasting his time, trying to disrupt his high and cause/increase paranoia. 

I informed him-EXACTLY, thus they are just as ineffective. So you can increase you own mind set of your usage and regulate it. As long as you (as he was) are attempting to be progressive in the society (employment, independent living and moving forward, NO DISTRIBUTION or COOKING). Which he was removed from.

He to old to continue to keep him STATE DEPENDENT and recovery is NOT going to HAPPEN!

R.E.D.U. Drug Testimonial 1992-2015 and Drug Dealer Liability Act

https://paulgoree.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/r-e-d-u-reverse-the-environment-of-drugs-and-you-work-in-progress/

R.E.D.U is the acronym for Reverse Environment Drugs and You. It in part is a testimonial of my life of drug usage, which awkwardly began in 1992. Ambitious and unknowledgeable, I was attending Seattle Community College. My goal was to obtain my A.A. and a Q.C.D.C which today are titled CAADAC & NAADAC. Having never used drugs, I found it difficult to counsel others on the matter. However I quickly learned that counseling was not an personal advice effort. But was depended and structured around a practical formula. I unwittingly asked the instructor, “How can I counsel someone on marijuana use, when I have never used marijuana?” I was immediately reminded of the technique we were reviewing in another class on counseling. Well that explanation was enough for me, and so I decided, that we live and learn. And from that day forward, I set out to try all the drugs on the National Institute of Drug, drug chart. The chart consist of the following categories: Prescription Medication, Other Compounds (ex: anabolic steroids), Hallucinogens, Dissociative Drugs (ex: Ketamine), Club Drugs (ex: MDMA), Stimulants, Opioids, Cannabinoids, Alcohol and Tobacco.

From 1992 till 2011, I accomplished my imprudent goal. Today I look back at that self-challenge and am thankful to faith (Yes, I always prayed to GOD to see me through the madness I had positioned myself). I am also thankful to the various instructors, users, and theories regarding drug usage. When I was 18 I sign petition and later voted for ballot measure Assigned Number 692- Sponsors Karen Pehoushek and Mr. Robert Killian- The petition secured 260,335 signatures. The petition was found to have sufficient valid signatures, and appeared on the Nov. 3, 1998, General Election Ballot in the state of Washington. (WOW look at Washington State today 2015-Liberty does work and the people have spoken!! update: 3/23/2015)

NOW from another prospective, I have been interested in Drug Dealer Liability since 2002, here is some interesting facts and explanation of the program...

DRUG DEALER LIABILITY ACT

http://www.modelddla.com/Overview_of_the_Model_Drug-Dealer_Liability_Act.htm

Overview of the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:

Legislatures across the nation are passing a unique new statute that provides redress for those injured by illegal drugs. This new law, known as the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act (DDLA), makes drug dealers civilly liable to those injured by a driver under the influence of drugs, families who lose a child to illegal drugs and others injured by illegal drugs. It is essentially a products liability act for illegal drugs.

Michigan, Oklahoma, Illinois, Hawaii, Arkansas, California, South Dakota, Utah, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Colorado, South Carolina, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Hampshire, Tennessee and New York have passed the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act. Existing law in the remaining states does not clearly establish a means by which drug dealers can be made to pay damages for the injuries they cause. The Drug Dealer Liability Act fills that void. The first lawsuit brought under the Act resulted in a judgment on July 21, 1995 of $1 million in favor of a drug baby and more than $7 million to the city of Detroit’s expenses for providing drug treatment to inmates in Detroit jails. Two Detroit dealers were ordered to pay the damages to the drug baby’s siblings because the baby was born addicted to cocaine and was later bludgeoned to death by her mother while high on drugs. In Utah, the wife of a drug-using professional brought a Drug Dealer Liability Act case against her husband’s dealer of six years. The defendant in that case settled after losing his pretrial challenges to the Drug Dealer Liability Act. In South Dakota in April 2000 a jury returned a verdict under South Dakota’s Drug Dealer Liability Act in the amount of $268 Million in favor of a woman whose husband was killed in a head on collision with a driver under the influence of drugs. The defendant was not the driver of the car but the dealer who supplied drugs to the driver.

States that have adopted the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:

The following states have adopted the Model Drug Dealer Liability Act:

Arkansas - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Ark. Acts No. 896 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. '' 16-124-101 to -112 (Michie Supp. 1997)).

California - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1996 Cal. Legis. Serv. 3792 (West) (codified at Cal. Health & Safety Code '' 11700 to 11717 (West Supp. 1998)).

Colorado - Colo. Rev. Stat. 13-21-801 to 813.

Georgia - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 Ga. Laws 387 (codified at O.C.G.A. ' 51-1-46 (Supp. 1998)).

Hawaii - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Haw. Sess. Laws ch. 203 (codified at Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. ' 663D (Michie Supp. 1997)).

Illinois - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1995 Ill. Leg. Serv. 89-293 (West) (codified at 740 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 57/1-25 (West Supp. 1997)).

Indiana - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 Ind. Acts 2924 (codified at Ind. Code Ann. ' 34-1-70 (Michie Supp. 1998) (repealed by 1998 Ind. Acts. 8 (effective July 1, 1998)); Reenacted by by P.L.1-1998, SEC.19 (codified at Ind. Code Ann. 34-24-4-1 to 14).

Louisiana - Louisiana Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1997 La. Sess. Law Serv. 719 (West) (codified at La. Rev. Stat. Ann. '' 9:2800.61-.76 (West Supp. 1998)).

Michigan - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1994 Mich. Legis. Serv. 27 (West) (codified at Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. '' 691.1601-.1619 (West Supp. 1998)).

New Hampshire - Chapter 318-C:1, et seq. (2005).

New Jersey - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 2001, N.J.S.A. Title 2C. Chapter 35B §§1-15.

New York - Drug Dealer Liability Act, Gen. Oblig. Sec. 12-101 et seq.

Oklahoma - Drug Dealer Liability Act, 1994 Okla. Sess. Law Serv. ch. 179 (West) (codified at Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 63, '' 2-421 to -435 (West 1997)).

South Carolina - S. Carolina Stat. 44-54-10 to 140.

South Dakota - South Dakota Codified Laws Sec. 34-20 C-1 et seq.

Tennessee - TCA 29-38-101 et seq. [2005, ch. 77].

Utah - Drug Dealer's Liability Act, 1997 Utah Laws 1991 (codified at Utah Code Ann. 58-37e-1 to -14 (Supp. 1998)).

U.S. Virgin Islands - 19 V.I.C. 641 to 658

Copyright © 2010 Daniel Bent. All rights reserved.