Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts

Saturday, December 30, 2017

2018 is it 1984 by Orwell: "“FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,” “TWO AND TWO MAKE FIVE,” and “GOD IS POWER.”.




Article Image

 SECTIONS OF GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984:
   The relevance of Orwell's 1984 that pertains to modern day society. Is the fact that technology has change the way by which individuals citizens become collective. They are in a state of fear as technology has made the sovereignty more powerful through telescreen surveillance. Liberty is a thought of the past, by which no one is to remember. Yet Winston can't forget the past. As he determines if he will follow the BROTHERHOOD, or will he be attentive to the Party (sovereignty of OCEANIA). Failure to comply to the Party results in torture and death. O'Brien represent the operative of enforcement who are patriots to the sovereignty and will do anything to capture those who have free thoughts and believe in the past. The past was when INDIVIDUALISM, and LIBERTY lead to FREEDOM. These days  are long gone! It is 2018 and yet, our liberties are slowly eroding into comformity.


 O’Brien shocks Winston by turning off the telescreen. Believing that he is free of the Party’s observation, Winston boldly declares that he and Julia are enemies of the Party and wish to join the Brotherhood. O’Brien tells them that the Brotherhood is real, that Emmanuel Goldstein exists and is alive, and leads them through a ritual song to initiate them into the order of rebellion. O’Brien gives them wine, and Winston proposes that they drink to the past... Winston continues to seek an overall explanation of the Party’s control over the present and the past... this discourse provides a long lull in the dramatic tension of the novel, setting up the surprising turn of events that the arrival of the Thought Police constitutes...Winston sits in a bright, bare cell in which the lights are always on—he has at last arrived at the place where there is no darkness. Four telescreens monitor him. He has been transferred here from a holding cell... His dreams of the Brotherhood are wrecked when O’Brien, his hoped-for link to the rebellion, enters his cell. Winston cries out, “They’ve got you too!” To which O’Brien replies, “They got me long ago,” and identifies himself as an operative of the Ministry of Love. O’Brien asserts that Winston has known O’Brien was an operative all along, and Winston admits that this is true....O’Brien oversees Winston’s prolonged torture sessions. O’Brien tells Winston that his crime was refusing to accept the Party’s control of history and his memory. As O’Brien increases the pain, Winston agrees to accept that O’Brien is holding up five fingers, though he knows that O’Brien is actually holding up only four—he agrees that anything O’Brien wants him to believe is true....Slowly, Winston begins to accept O’Brien’s version of events. He begins to understand how to practice doublethink, refusing to believe memories he knows are real... After some time, Winston is transferred to a more comfortable room and the torture eases...He comes to the conclusion that he was foolish to oppose the Party alone, and tries to make himself believe in Party slogans. He writes on his slate “FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,” “TWO AND TWO MAKE FIVE,” and “GOD IS POWER.”...O’Brien replies that obeying Big Brother is not sufficient—Winston must learn to love him. O’Brien then instructs the guards to take Winston to Room 101...In Room 101, O’Brien straps Winston to a chair, then clamps Winston’s head so that he cannot move. He tells Winston that Room 101 contains “the worst thing in the world.” He reminds Winston of his worst nightmare...Though his stay at the Ministry of Love has broken his mind and will and though his love for Big Brother precludes the need to think for himself, Winston still envisions the day that the Party will shoot him...

EXTRA SECTIONS OF GEORGE ORWELL'S : 1984 
 Winston’s powerful fascination with the enigmatic O’Brien leads him to trust O’Brien and feel safe in his presence, in much the same way that he feels safe in the room above Mr. Charrington’s shop. Winston’s hopeful belief in the Brotherhood, uncharacteristic for a man as fatalistic as he, actually contributes to his sense of impending doom...O’Brien seems to represent a powerful figure willing to undermine the Party. He offers a connection to the Brotherhood, and has an iron will dedicated to fighting the Party. He knows and is interested in the past, as can be seen in his knowledge of the song about St. Clement’s Church. He is the embodiment of everything Winston hoped he would be. As such, O’Brien fills Winston with a hope that he has never before experienced.

Unlike Winston, Julia is not interested in widespread rebellion; she simply likes outwitting the party and enjoying herself. She explains to Winston that the Party prohibits sex in order to channel the sexual frustration of the citizenry into fervent opposition to Party enemies and impassioned worship of Big Brother.

 Like the Two Minutes Hate, the Party’s parading of political enemies through public squares is a demonstration of psychological manipulation... the Party’s use of such displays illustrates how war serves to preserve cultural uniformity. War unites the citizens in opposition against some shadowy foreign evil while also making it impossible for its subjects to meet or exchange ideas with citizens from other countries, since the only foreigners in London are prisoners of war....Her understanding of sexual repression as a mechanism to incite “war fever” and “leader worship” renders her sexual activity a political act.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

America's Quasi Safety Patrol: End of Civil Liberties for Citizens


Consider the article that was written in Atlantic Magazine November 2016 issue-"Safe But Scary Future." There are many new question that need to be attended to by this nation, seeming our future has already begun. Does this country need a unauthorized (unauthorized by the people) disrespectful, citizen patrol that's purpose would be to secure our liberties?  Would it be wise to allow, a quasi group of Americans, to be the judgment of our civic living and to have them determine, pre-judicial circumstances: by which they forward to the police (the real civic patrol) department?

Suppose such a group had alternative motives: Suppose a group could SLAP A PERSON ON THE ASS. Suppose a group could ENTRAP a person, just to cause a distraction to apprehend another citizen. Suppose a person could mentally harasses a person with stress that would be invisible. Maybe these quasi patrol would  inter-weave themselves within the civic societal environment, and utilize a  NEW TYPE OF SURVEILLANCE - In the environment observations.


How would we be sure that these new quasi patrol would have our best interest at hand? How would they determine if a citizen is or is not capable of handling the circumstances by which they placed themselves? WAIT...what about civil liberties, does that not matter any more? What if they inducted citizens that did not desire to be involved with them? And what about the level of security they would be granted? How could we be sure that our society is safer or scarier? I would not trust such a group?  They would be like invisible thieves in the night, by which our security would be based on their stratergized agenda. Whose stratergized agenda, is the Pentagon aware of these quasi groups? What if these quasi patrol groups fragmented among themselves, becoming a possible cause of national security-NEW CIVIL WAR!

If I have been avoiding the act of being inducted into such a group since 1999. Then it has come evident to me, that such a secret society exist. They do have access to such hi-tech surveillance equipment such as V2K devices! Who they report to and what their purpose is-remains unknown. Why they have not killed me, remains unknown. But to continue their existence in the dark and be the quasi hero-cowards they are, is not what this county needs. Their LOUD and DISRESPECTFUL use of the 1st Amendment, minimizes our security, each time they attempt to protect their identities to those of us, who have been affected by their presence. One would think that they would remain as far as possible from those of us who are not and will not surrender our liberty to them. So if and when this nation begins to fragment. We can look to these coward quasi hero as the source!