2 COMPANIES OF DEOTOGLOGICAL ETHICS TO
BE CONCERN ABOUT (By: Paul Goree 8/2015)
INDIVIDUAL WIT: DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (Right Theory):
Cali Reflecting, and I am upset about the intentional actions of
some towards me, as they sought to demean and judicially correct my wrongs-as
they saw them unjust.
Such wrongs as in 2005 when I petition the court clerk in Clark
County, NV to prevent an eviction. The eviction resulted from a pre-mature sale
of a property in an African American working class neighborhood, where the
owners all owned their property and were near or in retirement. The pre-mature
sale involved a pre-approved loan finance company in Southern California
(LA/SD) and their questionable relationship with a local California bank. The
pre-mature purchased ended up in a bulk sale of foreclosures purchased by a
major banking organization as a regular transaction. The judge attended to my
petition and a court hearing was placed over the eviction after the Constable
placed the eviction.
MISUNDERSTANDING –FATAL RESULT: ULITIARTIAN ETHICS:
Another time, 2006. I was handed a progress report from a bank. I
didn't think much of it at first. Looking at the report longer, I questioned
usually activity from various issuing bank. Apparently for some reason all of
these accounts had been issued a new card. This report was nationwide, that
seemed impossible. After probing further I found out the re-issuing was due to
a purchasing error on the manufacturing side. The manufacturing company CSR
sales offices was located in Las Vegas, NV. The product was growth hormones,
which at the time was causing some consumer confusion. I devised a quick 5
question survey to find out about the purchase and also to see for myself if
the FDA PBS mass media notification were effective or confusing. Two questions
(opening-after qualifying) focus on customer’s awareness. One asked had the
customer seen any of the FDA public service announcements, warning Americans
not to purchase growth hormones. The announcements utilized all 3 media forms
(print, TV, and radio). The second question asked had the purchaser consulted
their doctor before making the purchase. The final two questions focused on the
packaging and purchase. These were open ended, and is where the majority of the
information regarding the entire telemarketing sales call derived.
I had a sample of over 5 thousand (the original report) which I
had to probe and research to identify 50 names with corresponding phone numbers
nationwide. I only ended up doing 5 surveys, due to what I had learned. One of
the respondents mother purchased the product and died as a result of using the
product. This respondent was a lawyer and thanked me for calling seeming she
had been waiting for some closure/conclusion-and now was determine on her own
to find the facts regarding her mother death. Another respondent was from
Florida and he insisted his sister listen in on the survey since it was his
conclusion that the product had killed their father and now began to result in
complications of his will and family closure.
It seems that even with the FDA's public service announcement,
which may or may not have been observed by the purchaser. These two senior
citizens against doctors’ orders, purchased the product over the phone. When
the product arrived it was packaged and mailed in such a way that opening it
immediately expired any return options (seeming it was medication classified).
Apparently 4 or so vials of the fluid liquid could be seen, but no instruction
on how to administer the dosages. The Florida respondent his father ended up
drinking a vial a week. Resulting in his death. Both respondents stated that
they were not happy about the return policy of the unopened monthly arrivals of
the product. The lawyer commented she later found out that when her mother made
the purchase it was annually and billed as such. Hence she thought the credit
card company was looking into the matter legally. Seeming they had sent her
mother a new credit card.
No comments:
Post a Comment