Showing posts with label margret finn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label margret finn. Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Margret Finn of South West Behavioral Services, LIES about Phoenix Police Department.

Margaret Finn of South West Behavioral Services, LIES about Phoenix Police Department. (Case Manager Neglect ) by: Paul Goree



This is the ongoing details regarding the neglected actions and defamations of South West Behavioral Services case manager Margaret Finn. Till date 4 years have elapses and still no conclusion or actions have been taken against Margaret Finn. Margret Finn herself has failed to acknowledge her wrongful actions, and there effect upon client Paul Goree. Thus I will continue to disclosure valuable details of the events as they occurred from Nov 2012 to the present.

In is imperative that all case managers and civic personal that interact with citizens, understand the affect they have on an individual. Deceptive behavior and expression, not only cause confusion for clients, but also reflect upon inter civic departments.  For example, Margret Finn has cost the state of ARIZONA and CALIFORNIA, valuable social service dollars, as I continue to be unable to progress forward without CLOSURE of her actions.  I think Mrs. Finn fully needs to understand the doubt she has cast upon other interlinked departments, such as the Phoenix Police Department is detrimental to the social collective.

“There is a police/social work partnerships that serve as a community response to crisis situations signaled by calls for police service.” (Charles W. Dean, Ph.D., University of North Carolina). The importance of the police/case management partnership is to provide communicational link by which the police department aids in the socio-factors of development for the client. These factors are within the environment of the client’s placement. And aid the police department as the officers secure a safety-productive environment not only for the client, but for the general society.

November 2012, Margaret Finn’s clients Paul Goree and Angel Thurman had an incident with the Phoenix Police Department. Client Angel Thurman called 911, and made a complaint against client Paul Goree. The complaint expressed notions that Paul Goree had threaten Angel Thurman with several knives. The 911 dispatched 5 Phoenix Police units to 4802 N 19th Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85015. The police officer after securing the apartment and gathering the report, concluded by providing a CIVIC 101 Lesson of appropriate usage of 911 services to Angel Thurman. The officer then requested the name and phone number of the case manager: Johnny Garcia/Margaret Finn South West Behavioral Services. Finally the officer informed me as he wrote upon his report, that he would be requesting a SEPARATION INTERVENTION, seeming he had concluded that Thurman and Goree’s living arrangement was not going to be practical: and would only result in repeat incidences.

I agreed with the officer and later reflected upon the monetary cost, Angel Thurman’s false phone call cost the city of Phoenix. That cost also includes the 2 later complaints (December 2012 and February 2013).  Three 911 calls to the Phoenix Police Department, expressing complaints from Angel Thurman about the living discomfort both he and I were experiencing. Yet not one intervention from Margret Finn and South West Behavioral Services.

When I confronted Margaret Finn with questions as to why she nor Johnny Garcia intervene as the Phoenix Police Department had requested, she replied, “She had not received any police reports or incident reports from the Police Department.” Once again Margret Finn lies to conceal her unethical manners.  I questioned whether Mrs. Finn actually expects me to believe that the Phoenix Police Department is lying. This is the type of character flaw that should to be examine regarding Mrs. Finns conduct as a case manager.


The 911 calls and the corresponding police reports can easily be pulled to provide the evidence needed to conclude Margaret Finns and South West Behavioral Services neglect. Had Mrs. Finn attended to the 3 police interventions ranging from November 2012 thru February 2013, I would have been placed in a different environment, and proceed forward productively.  At this point, I will seek legal representation against Mrs. Finn and South West Behavioral Services. I think Mrs. Finn does not fully understand the importance of her position as if affects the lives of others and incurred financial expenses and continued dependency upon social services, effecting the state’s economic security.

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

My Tombstone Engraving..."Damn You Maragret Finn"...

The emotional process of "CLOSURE" involves removal of repressed thoughts and feelings of an incident. It aids a client/individual in grasping a full understanding of the factors which existed related to their incident. Mostly it provides the client/individual with building blocks to progress forward: a strength based development technique

I have no CLOSURE, from the Phoenix Arizona Incident involving Margaret Finn, Juan Garcia and South West Behavioral Services/HUD.  Margret firmly stated to both Juan Garcia and I,..."We each have to take responsibility for our roles in this terrible ordeal..." Then proceeded to have Juan Garcia agree to Hus actions..my agreement was written in a memo sent to both... And yet she failed to include herself in, what she termed...‘OUR" ordeal.

At this point I'd rather Margret Finn simply deny the alligations I have posted about her unethical behavior as a case manager:  and have her denial suggest mal character of my integrity. At least I'll have CLOSURE.

Otherwise upon my death, the tombstone will read as the image states.

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Margret Finn swbs #2

027432992@iwirelesshometext.com

not comform to their desires. Now the same dissatisfication Beck had with Finn and Garcia, was now my reality-as Thurmans disruptive 
6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
placement at the CASA shelter-why was Thurman given speical treatment. TILL this day I question Finn and Garcia's motive. Did they want

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
to get back at me by placing Thurman to intentional create a hostile environment-due to their discontent of Beck and my refusal to 
6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
advising me that Garcia would be dropping off Angel Thurman as my new roommate. Thurman was experiencing some type of housing emergency

027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
and thus the meet and greet proceedure would just be a decision made by Finn and Garcia. All other clients emergency housing was

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
2-2...Becks contract expired and unlike the procedure of my meet and greet: Becks replacements meet and greet was a basic phone call 
027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
complaints. I COULD NOT BELIEVE FINN AND GARCIA were actually being so unethical. At the meet and greet I did not follow they (6/6) 


6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
behavior. They wanted me to be assertive and firm leading Beck to understand I would not 

027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
continued misplacement of questionable roommates who always due to their (4/6) actions induced undesirable substance usage and 

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
iimmature actions by which he plagued the South West (3/6) Behavioral Building on Osborn/3rd st. With complaints of their neglect and 
6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
Subject:1-2
The reason some must come and suface- is because Margret Finn and 
027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
roommate Stephen Beck-violated his (2/6) confidentiality as they briefed me before a meet and greet with him. They were upset at his 

027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
those misusing the air waves (whether as a serious plot/cover up/or joke) some settle occurances become the advantage of much worst e


027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
anyone that their death was coming! That they should passively accept it. Lets pray for the sake of all Americans that intelli capture

027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
undedicated frequency wave! It becomes possible that any sub cult can actually utilize and alter this technology to decieve or induce

Margret Finn south west behavioral services



27432992@iwirelesshometext.com


2 of 2...ample evidence to myself and ASU advisor/Dean of Social Welfare and evaluators of the Social Welfare program- that my true 

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
impossible. I ALONG with my ASU academic advisor created a empowering gradual schedule by which I could over a 2 year period obtain res

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
determinate actions to propel me further than I had during my wilder younger life. Much lived much learned now I want to attempt the 


027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
continued. I came to Phoenix Arizona to accomplish as an adult student the final portions of my degree and to develope possible self 

6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
South West Nehavioral Services with their Homeless Out Reach Program. I ADVISED THEM I WAS NOT INTERESTED!!! However their suggests 
6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
and disregarded my academic pursuit at ASU. They kept making references about possible field assignments and positions available at 


6027432992@iwirelesshometext.com
Besides violating my civil liberities- I am mostly upset with Margret Finn and Juan Johnny Garcia's actions as they simply disrespected

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Case Manager Neglect: The Importance of Civil Liberties

CASE MANAGER NEGLECT: THE IMPORTANCE OF CIVIL LIBERTIES

We the people, of the nation for the people by the people: Value the guarantee of security, found in our civil liberties. These liberties are rooted in the Bill of Rights. They insure that as a citizen of the United States of America no individual or organizations can violate our pursuit of happiness and life!!! Yet case managers like Margret Finn and Johnny Juan Garcia from South West Behavioral Services, have proven these liberties NO LONGER have any weight or security. This passive move of theirs, is being done at a time when our nation is defending us AMERICANS from terrorist. Yet their actions are slowly eroding the core values by which we are subject to a desensitized understanding and acceptance of our rights. I can not and will not let this ordeal be sweep under the rug:because no matter what the out come is-my AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES WILL NOT BE VIOLATED AND GO UNATTENDED!

Margret Finn
South West Behavioral Services
Violated 5th Amendment of Paul Goree (May 2013)
May 2013- Mrs. Finn failed to acknowledge the private property rights of Mr. Goree. All Americans have the right to the TOTAL ownership of their private property and purchases. It is irrelevant if the private property is .10 cent lollipop or $80,000.00 car. If we allow these minute variances become non-acknowledge, then we contribute to our nations decline. My paid invoice from COX Communication gurantees ownership, by which I am the only person who can delegate usage, sale, or transfers: Not Mrs. Finn.

Johnny Juan Garcia
South West Behavioral Services
Violated 4th Amendment of Paul Goree and Guest (June 2013)
June 2013- Mr. Garcia failed to acknowledge that residency privacy is a matter of the property owner/management and the public enforcement (local police). The act of entering a private dwelling is not a decision sub contractual agents (such as case managers at South West Behavioral Services) can decided upon their own. The only people who can enter a property is the property owner/management and the local police (with a complaint or warrant). As Mr.Garcia entered my private dwelling, he violated not only my civil liberties, he also violated my guest civil liberties. My guest was a prior tenant, waiting for Mr. Garcia (property management had called Mr. Garcia’s office) to come and unlock the door to his prior apartment so that he could retrieve his personal items. Mr. Garcia to anxious to delegate the law, order him to leave the premises. After which Mr. Garcia called the police, who upon their arrival informed Mr.Garcia not to continue informing me of who and who can not be in this apartment: other wise he would be violating my civil liberties.
ALL AMERICANS have a gurantee of civil liberties, for more information about civil liberties, visit:


Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Case Manager's Violating Civil Liberties.

CASE MANAGERS VIOLATING CIVIL LIBERTIES.

How can Margret Finn and Johnny Juan Garcia validate their actions as reputable case managers, seeming they both have violated a client’s (a U.S. citizens) civil liberties.  This question is important; we can not have case managers violating the Federal Civil Liberties granted to us through the Bill of Rights and Constitutions.  These action cause more stress upon an individual and prevent an individual from pursuing life and happiness.

Margret Finn’s Violation: May 2013
I established a Cox Communication account September 2012. This account was exclusively for Wi-Fi use, so that I could have internet access for my studies at ASU.  Sometime in May 2013, Mrs. Finn’s and Mr. Garcia’s second client (my roommate) established an account at Cox Communication with, his account was for DSL telephone service, and television. He mistakenly did not get the required Wi-Fi service needed to run the DSL telephone.  One day he demanded that I allow him to use my Wi-Fi service. I was using the service for my studies. The signal could not carry both of us, and thus each time he logged on to the DSL service it kicked me off.

Mrs. Finn and Mr. Garcia were called to resolve. They arrived and Mrs. Finn instructed me that I had to share my Wi-Fi with their second client. How can these case managers instruct me, as to how I needed  to allocate my private property against my will? This is violating my 5th Amendment rights.
Within the 5th Amendment, it is stated..."to be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..." Considering this clause, it is important that the following is understood, with regards to private property:
1.) The owner's exclusive authority to determine how private property is used.
2.) The owner's peaceful possession, control, and enjoyment of his/her legally purchased, deeded private property.
3.) The owner's ability to make contracts or decisions to use, sell, rent, or give away all or part of the legally purchased/deeded private property.


Johnny Juan Garcia’s Violation: June 2013
There was a visitor in my apartment. The visitor was waiting on Mr. Garcia to arrive so that he could retrieve his personal items. Mr. Garcia finally arrived, and provided me with eviction papers from the program. Then Mr. Garcia proceeded to yell at my guest and tell me that I could not have him in the apartment. Mr. Garcia then told us to hang on, as he went to call the police.  Mr. Garcia returned with the Phoenix Police and began to continue his rhetoric , until he was interrupted by the police officer, who informed him,” not to continue…seeming he would be violating my civil liberties.”  She then proceed to speak informing us all that only the property manger and the police can inform a tenant who has to be removed from the property. But by then it was after the fact, seeming Mr. Garcia had already done this.

Within the social services professional organizations exist to attend to the guidelines by which the profession and the employees and clients are helped. The code of conduct exist to prevent case managers such as Mrs. Finn and Mr. Garcia from violating a clients Civil Liberties and creating PTSD upon individuals and the society.  The Case Manager Society of America is one of these professional organization which serves as such.

CMSA works to help people understand that a case manager’s involvement is instrumental in providing quality health care to patients nationwide. One of CMSA’s goals is to educate people so that everyone in the U.S. understands what a case manager is and where to go to enlist their services. It is important to realize that case managers can be nurses, social workers, mental health professionals, occupational therapists, and professionals from a variety of settings, including government agencies, long-term care facilities, insurance and health maintenance organizations, nonprofits, rehabilitation facilities and other settings.


Case managers devote hours of time, expertise, and dedication to supporting individuals, family members and caregivers who seek their help and intervention. In turn, CMSA helps support case managers with a variety of tools and resources, including its newly revised Standards of Practice for Case Management (http://www.cmsa.org/SOP), its Case Management Model Act (http://www.cmsa.org/PolicyMakers), as well as CMSA’s Annual Conference and Expo. As the health care industry continues to grow in complexity, CMSA is committed to advancing case managers’ profession, emphasizing professional standards, integrity and quality care.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Tact, Mr.Lincoln-Simple Lincoln


TACT, MR.LINCOLN-SIMPLE LINCOLN. (by: Paul Dewitt Goree 2014/10 phxaz)

TACT, Mr. Lincoln (“Simple Lincoln”)
I have been posting several post (various social networks) that are beneficial to me as I go through what I am perceiving as it is happening to me. Thus since 2013 I’ve been posting about a Default (last/formal declaration or accordance) resulting in a Revolt. And until the revolt has closure, all that was constructed cannot simply be abolished. For several reasons, first we (I) am an American, and with that title comes the rights of expression. I cannot nor will wavier my freedom to express, that which I believe is correct. Likewise I encourage all to utilize to the most, their liberties, advocate our liberties and allow all to do the same. The events of my revolt, are due to the negligent actions of 2 case managers (Juan (Johnny) Garcia and Margret Finn) at SouthWest Behavioral Services. I can’t believe that the state of Arizona has licensed 2 case managers, providing them the right to do as they please. The disruption of another persons life could have been prevented by them. The additional comments and suggestion from other professionals, (like the Phoenix Police Department) went unattended to, as I let my life plunged downward, shock that these events are going unattended. As of 10/30/2014 legal action seems to be either too expensive or difficult. Thus I am left to continue writing and posting that maybe LIBERTY in the United States is bias. And that characters, such as Finn and Garcia can actually get away with murder. How many other clients have they done wrong. I’ve met 5 other. So Arizona is in the end responsible for licensing unethical case managers!
READ MORE AT: http://paulgoree.blogspot.com/2014/09/client-profile-debate-unethical-actions.html
With that in mind, this week (Monday 20, 2014) I came across an uplifting article in the Smithsonian. The article was uplifting because it made me realize that my actions as they may be perceive by others, at some point are not well with me either. For example this article is definite proof to me, that my effort has interfered with my prior developed intent. The article was published February 2014 and I am just now reading it October 2014. Shame on me!!! But then it’s best to receive information when it is timely. Timely for me, is this week.The article Lincoln’s Boys is by Joshua Zeltz. As I read this article, I was amazed, up to page 77. Upon which the amazement became an internalization (providing for me validation or my purpose). What was written is as follows…
“(Lincoln) Populated his cabinet with former opponents for the Republican presidents discernment and magnanimity in choosing men who he “did not know”…He recognized them as governors, senators, and statesmen, while they yet looked upon him as a simple frontier lawyer at most, and a rival to who chance had transferred the honor they felt to be due to themselves.” Presaging the popular argument that Lincoln forged a “team of rivals”…the strong personalities and talents who constituted his inner circle did not always appreciate, “the stronger will and …more delicate tact [that] inspired and guided them all.” (Smithsonian, pg.77)
Upon reading this section, I paused and quickly reflect upon my own life (my entire life). What first comes to thought is the book, The Elephant in The Room by Eviatar Zerubavel. Lincoln’s elephant was his life developed tact (which I term his Americanism), and how that lived tact flourished to it’s fullest purposes (regardless of all else, it seems at times). The fact that others ignore or are in denial of the elephant, doesn’t diminish from their effort, as far as Lincoln is concerned. Seeming through his actions alone, accepting them as the persons that they are, as they introduce themselves, as they follow through with their corresponding actions. Still isn’t reason for him to alter any aspect of his life, as lived. Their appreciation of his life development, criticized by them with expression of his leadership abilities, his simple minded ways and thoughts, his inability to choose worthy persons (from his wife to generals), his gullible nature, awkward stance, and peculiar essences. With all of their comments/thoughts/critics, he did by action alone, let them and their expression be, as they should be: VALID. Seeming this is the United States of America, and their opinions are guaranteed through the INDIVIDUALISM of our LIBERTY. Very well tact, Mr. Lincoln was.
I at this point in my life, having be so tolerable and accepting of much, cannot and will not alter, what is already developed. Some still criticize me for being gullible in nature when it comes to all of those I seem to so easily let drift into my life: which results in various attempts of mayhem. I’m ok with that, knowing that it is of my intent to never prevent another from expressing themselves as they attempt to explain or correct what they perceive. Humiliation is insignificant, when principles of expression, individualism, liberty and justice are in question.
I chose to only express my ordeal over the internet. That is my intended thought, by which much criticism is obtain by using such a limiting (as some may perceive) medium to deal with something that is personable. But then I have always admire those who push their freedoms and agendas, seeming it is through those actions that they become LEDGENDARY in the minds of those of the future. All events on the various blogs and social networks are my expression of events that occurred from 11/2012-06/2013 and have trickled down to a revolt of standards of the SCR. No event is without causation. No causation exist upon its own existences. In this social (SCR) reality, we are a social people, and all actions done upon one, eventually effects the entire. Thus Onward with my Default/Revolt.
Also in the spirit of all that has been expressed by me in this posting. I would like to give some credit to a great church/organizational program. Whereby I needed some “pray” for motivation, and I got a daily bread tract plus note in a purple envelope (scan posting to follow soon). I received this purple envelope on 9/28/2014 when I, going through the dull routine events of my REVOLT in Phoenix (again, explanation posting to come). The result of one of these dull events is complete dehydration and energy lost due to no food. I went their and got a lunch sack. There was a purple envelope that stated in a note, Romans 15:13 and a personal note (daily bread) stating, “I am praying that you will see God’s Blessings today”. Which I did, as I read the tract included and it Romans 3:23:6:23. Thank You CHURCH ON THE STREET for being and providing that “pray” I needed 10/13/2014, when I finally opened the envelope and read it

Friday, October 10, 2014

Case Manager Violating 5th Amendment! What is fair and not in America these days?

All the time this discussion was going on, client 2 was in his room, with a few of the strangers who were not interested in what client 1 had to say. A few days following this discussion, client 2 walked into the apartment with equipment he had purchased from Cox Communication. Client 1 had already had an account with Cox Communication for Wi-Fi service only. The account was established September 2012. Client 2 opened a new account in his own name for DSL telephone service (seeming the apartment lacked the stated telephone for emergency calls) and cable television services (the only television was in client 2’s bedroom). In order for the DSL telephone to function, it needed client 1’s Wi-Fi box and service. At first client 1 had no problem with letting client 2 use the service. However on this particular day, client 1 was working on some class work on his blackberry phone, seeming client 2 had stolen his laptop. Client 2 arrived home and went to turn on the DSL, interrupting the Wi-Fi signal of client 1.
 A confrontation resulted, whereby client 1 unplugged the Wi-Fi box and placed it in his room. Client 2 demanded that client 1 plug it back in. Client 1 refused. Client 2 then proceeded to go to the front office of the apartment complex and call the case workers. Client 2 returned and informed client 1 that both case workers were coming over. When the case workers arrived they attempted to resolve the problem. They did not address any of the prior 6 months of neglect and police reports, or the condition of the apartment, the welfare of the clients, simply the issue at hand. Client 2 explained the event, by accusing client 1 of not allowing him to use the cable signal for a telephone call. Client 1 respondent by informing the case managers that the cable signal is not the problem, the problem is that he was in the middle of doing some class work on his private property, with his private account that he had invested over $700 in over the past 10 months with Cox Communication, and that he did not feel he had to attend to Client 2’s disrespectful demand! Client 1 pointed out to the case managers that not only has he let client 2 use the Wi-Fi box, not once did client 2 show any appreciation with a simple thank you. He was upset with client 2’s constant plug in of the DSL box when both clients have cell phones, and that it cost him $75 dollars deposit for the connection to function, by which client 2 didn’t pay one dime. Thus in order for it to be equally shared doesn’t seem possible, seeming client 1 had the main account first and paid the deposit.
 The case workers respondent by urging client 1 to cooperate and let client 2 share the Wi-Fi signal. Client 1 concluded at this point that these two case workers were incompetent and that actions must be taken to have them reviewed.  A temporary agreement was made, which client 2 enjoyed, but client 1 felt was unfair. How could two case manager instruct a client as to how they need to allocate their private property against their will. This was a violation of client 1’s civil liberties (5th Amendment.). Within the 5th Amendment, it is stated..."be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..." Considering this clause, it is important that the following is understood, with regards to private property:
1.) The owner's exclusive authority to determine how private property is used.
2.) The owner's peaceful possession, control, and enjoyment of his/her legally purchased, deeded private property.
3.) The owner's ability to make contracts or decisions to use, sell, rent, or give away all or part of the legally purchased/deeded private property. (Tom Deweese, 2012).